Event Report: IP inclusive - Inappropriate Behaviour.Brand Finance 500 … What’s the value of music IP?.The new AG Opinion in Louboutin: is it really bad.Yet another horse – The Polo/Lauren Company L.P.Can Nativity scene characters attract copyright pr.Influencers and undisclosed sponsored activities.2017 Canadian trademark cases: progressive and reg.Stockholm Administrative Court orders ISP to provi.(No) privacy by default? German court finds Facebo.Strategies for Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy.Never too late: if you missed the IPKat last week!.Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us someth.Linking under US copyright law: green light to its.More than Just a Game (Report 1): eSports.Surveying the scene - passing off & surveys.Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision b.AIPPI UK Upcoming Event: Professor Bently to deba.BREAKING: UK IPO launches technical consultation.Here we go again? Strong brands as a barrier to e.Has Europe turned into the Eastern District of Tex.Never Too Late: if you missed the IPKat last week!.More than Just a Game (Report 2): Music, video ga.More than Just a Game (Report 3): Loot boxes and.UK IPO publishes consultation on implementing Trad.Top 10 issues from submissions before UK Supreme C.German FCJ: doctors can have their profile deleted.EPO looking for new legally qualified members of t.Repair or reconstruction: Where do you draw the li.L'Oreal v RN Ventures - The Registered Design Pers.PTAB puts a stop to Allergan's tribal sovereign im.GUCCI as a well-known mark, with special attention.Exclusive interview with Johanne Bélisle, Chief E.Do patents and literature have something in common?.The 1st specialized IP Tribunal of Northwest China.Current practice is to, however, allow a limited number of comments that contravene this policy, provided that the comment has a high degree of relevance and the comment chain does not become too difficult to follow. It is also the IPKat policy that comments should not be made completely anonymously, and users should use a consistent name or pseudonym (which should not itself be defamatory or obscene, or that of another real person), either in the "identity" field, or at the beginning of the comment. Comments will not be allowed if the contravene the IPKat policy that readers' comments should not be obscene or defamatory they should not consist of ad hominem attacks on members of the blog team or other comment-posters and they should make a constructive contribution to the discussion of the post on which they purport to comment. All comments must be moderated by a member of the IPKat team before they appear on the blog.